Showing posts with label good work. Show all posts
Showing posts with label good work. Show all posts

You Better Do What They Tell Ya

Wistful childhood memories bore me. Expressing a hackneyed sense of wonderment at children, child-like faith, children growing up--anything to do with children, ever--seems like a very tired, very cliched trope. I get it, you like your kids. Unless I know you, however, I just see your mommy-blog efforts to extract some keen insight about the human condition from dirty diapers as, well, full of crap. Lest you think that I am a heartless single young man (which I do not deny), if I do know you I will check your blog like a mom sticks her nose down a toddlers bum looking for stink--that is to say frequently, often during sacrament meeting, and with a perverse familiarity.

All of this poo-poo-ing of childhood memories (scatological trifecta now in play) is meant only to prove my curmudgeon bona-fides before I launch into my own childhood nostalgia. I ran across this picture of me on my aunt's blog the other day. Today as I was sunning in front of the library, supposedly writing a paper, I recalled being about this age, playing on the floor of the basement in our small house while my mom sewed something at the counter behind me. I was incredibly shy and preferred playing with blocks over talking to people. Good times, but I don't yearn to relive them.

I like where I am now. I like sending unapologetic emails to professors--"I am going to turn my paper in late and if you don't like that, I will drop your class." I like beginning a phone convesation with an investor in Dubai by proclaiming "Look, the venture capital model is broken...." I like piping up in an electrical engineering class saying "I do not doubt that superconducting transmission cables increase the efficiency of distributing electric power, but, Mr. Sukiyaki, you haven't included the true economic cost of using liquid nitrogen to cool the core of these lines, because, as we all know, liquid nitrogen is a byproduct of steel production, and hence, your figures will not scale correctly."

I am sure this is overcompensating for a childhood spent playing alone in the sand. Sometimes I think I am only pretending to be assertive, knowing, smart, decisive, independent, and even rebellious. But despite being a small, shy, quiet mama's boy, I remember having all those qualities even then. (Like tearing my sheets into strips during one of my better tantrums.) That's why I dislike the whole genre of children-as-roadmap-to-figure-out-life writing. Kids are complicated. You think you have children figured out, but you don't. You see this picture and think "lost little boy with a droopy lip and a cowlick in his hair"--children are so innocent, guileless, and they do what you tell them. No one would guess that the toddler in this picture is judging you, scorning you, and longing to scream with Rage Against the Machine "Screw you I won't do what you tell me!"

Nirvana

Golf. I like it. Why do I choose to write about it now? Well, unlike the paper I am writing about the economic underpinnings of private entrepreneurship in Zhejiang in the 1980s, I can think of things to say about golf.

I signed up for an on-campus beginner's golf class for a very shallow reason--I figured it would be useful in my future career as a serial schmoozer. Ten weeks of practice on the driving range have made me a true believer. I really like it.

Hitting practice balls on the range has a peculiar Zen-like quality. Bend down. Tee up a ball. Step back. Eye your shot. Walk in and set the driver down. Go through the checklist. Left instep in line with the tee. Club points to the pleat of your pants. Dip your right shoulder down. Pop your left forearm up. Flex the left pec to maintain form. Arch your back like you are shaking what your mama gave you. Weight on the back foot. Start your back swing. Left arm straight. Break at the wrist. Swing your hips. Wind the spring.

Showtime.

Swish your hips back through. Shift weight to the left foot. Natural, remember natural. Unleash the club. Hit half of the tee. Connect with a satisfying thwack. Ohh, great sound. Follow through, always follow through. Hips rotate to 90 degrees. Right heel comes up. You're in a ballet at this point. Stare purposefully into the distance. Track the ball through the bright flood lights. See it plop down on the green at 180 yards. Hold the pose for a while. Soak it in. Oomm... (Double-check to see if you are high. Nope.) ...mmmmmm. Reach down, tee up another ball.

I Think I Got High Last Night

I am responsible. Really. I try to get in bed at a reasonable hour. Sometimes when my schedule is skewampas, I take an Ambien to help me sleep and reset. Last night I accidentally took two.

As I was talking to my roommate Bob about our Saturday plans I said: "Hey Bob, I see two of you." As he related it to me this morning, I then hit my head against the door frame until he made me stop. My eyes were coming in and out of focus rapidly. He asked if I had taken anything. I told him the doctor prescribed 8 sleeping pills. Apparently that didn't phase him, because he just put me to bed.

After he shut the door, I popped out of bed and checked facebook. I spammed about 100 people with gushing wall posts and awkward quizzes. I guess deep down I wondered if other people thought my Spanish teacher from high school, several engaged friends, or my cousins were good kissers. I also posted a poll on my friend Katie's wall asking how many people thought she was religious. Fine, I guess, except that she isn't quite so into church these days. One acquaintance from high school asked me if I was on ecstasy. I am not that exotic.

This morning as I erased my facebook tracks I discovered some real winners. On Kat's wall I said: "I like you. I like your picture. Your picture is cute as a button." Seems strange in its see-Spot-run simplicity but not completely out of character. On Camile's wall I said: "I like you. I don't know what your goal is this year, but I hope you get it. You are a real winner." I was overcome by love and truth and vulgarity. I said as much on Caitlin's wall: "You girls are beautiful and righteous and obedient bitches." But what really confirmed that I got high last night was what I wrote on Broek's wall: "Your picture reminds me of my last novel...'the young maiden, hands behind her head, was arrested for unlicensed folk and emo sensibilities, though after being aroused out of her stupor, she came willingly to...'" Not sure where I was going with that, but as far as first lines of novels go, I think I am really on to something.

Best

Several years ago I came across an interesting article about success--that decades of deliberate practice, not innate talent, is what separates the truly great from the also-ran. I believe the article was popular because it's elevated stick-to-it-iveness above genetics. I reshaped the message: if I finally get serious about things, I can truly be great. The author of the article has a new book out. I will probably buy it, in more ways than one. A review here.

I have re-reshaped the message even further to hew closer to how one Nobel chemist explained his success. I forget his name. He freely admits that he is not the brightest mind in his field. His colleagues think he is a jerk. So far we seem to have a lot in common, well, besides that Nobel thing. He explains how he competes with more gifted colleagues by noting that while his "best" is not better than their "best," most people don't do their best. Invariably, your "best" will be better than the half-hearted attempt of someone brilliant.

Eyring discusses a related concept--the law of increasing returns. This is directly the opposite of the economic concept of the law of diminishing returns, that an increase in effort yields marginally less results. Rather many things in life are governed by this law of increasing returns. Pick any analogy. In physics, it is critical mass. In the dismal science, it is economies of scale. In literature, it is what post-structuralism reveals about the relativity of truth...er, ok, not any analogy. Simply stated, you put in hard work up front and things work out.

This year, rather than trying to bet my way into a faster race time, I think I will just try to absorb these principles. Besides, if you decide to not measure things, how can you fail?

Obama: Not God, Not World President

The Sunday Times has a good piece on the international (over)reaction to Obama's victory. Frankly, it's a bit out of hand. As the article reports, The Guardian, a UK paper, felt the need to write: "Welcome back into the world, America."

You pompous Brits, screw 18 generations of your colonizing, pale, gormless, anemic ancestors. (You still showing your chivalry by fighting every war to the last American?) I loathed every minute of the Bush/Cheney years, but the US people elected them and I truly believe they pursued what they saw as US national interests abroad. (Their perception, of course, was completely insane.)

Guess what? Obama will do the exact same thing. From the article:
Barack Obama has not been elected President of the World; the world is not his constituency; and his responsibilities to the world are secondary. He is President-elect of an important but declining power, and his responsibilities, especially in hard times, are to its citizens.
So to every nation that thinks Obama is their savior--he is not. He's ours. You see that flag in the background--it's not the UN. You want him to care about you, join on as the 51st state.

By the way, Britain, isn't speaking of America as a "declining power" a bit ironic given that you are an impotent nation of panty-waists with poor oral hygiene that is several centuries past its prime? How long do you think we will let you hold on to that seat in the UN Security Council or your over-representation in the IMF and the World Bank? India (you remember them right? the ones that claim your nation is the bastard child of a demon and a monkey) can counter-balance China and Russia just as well. Keep up that lip, just see what happens.

Crushing Guilt

Anytime I think of my own guilt, I think of 30 Rock. Video or transcript (last quote) of the crushing guilt scene.

Tonight, my friend Keith and I had a long conversation about all the things we feel guilty about. I am not quite done. Feel free to leave your guilt in the comments.

I feel guilty every Thursday night when I curse all the members of the AA group in my neighborhood. Great, you have been on the wagon 3 months but you still park like a drunk!

I feel guilty when I roll out of bed at 11 AM (or noon) and then tell myself that I shouldn't spend too much time on work-related tasks because "that would be a waste of time."

I feel incredibly guilty that almost all of my goals involve managing excess--eat less, relax less, own less, wander less on the internet. I am literally drowning in food, free time, possessions, and information when many people lack all of those. (By the way, here'sinteresting story about a "100 Thing Challenge", which as the name would imply, involves owning only 100 personal items.)

I feel guilty that my FSA at work will reimburse the full $1,300 for lasik even though by the time I quit I will have only contributed $300 to the plan. (I called and asked if I could fully fund the account, but apparently there is no way.)

I feel guilty that I ignore all news about Iraq, Israel, and the Middle East in general--it is too difficult to sort out all of the players, who's up, who's bad, so I just ignore everything.

Lastly, I feel guilty as I discover more and more issues where I agree with Conservatives. Every pay stub I think "I wouldn't mind lower taxes." I don't know if "starving the beast" works, but I think I would like a smaller government. Perhaps my grandpa was right all along to curse FDR--I will never see any of the money I am paying into Social Security. Baby Boomers are thieves. Did I mention, I enjoy mindless vitriol--a key plank in the Republican platform.

A quick note to Ben, my 2028 campaign manager--remind me to delete this blog before I run on the Democratic ticket. My work experience (outsourcing American middle class jobs 300 at time) will be damning enough, I don't need some post about how I ignore the Middle East, want to cut taxes, hate social programs, and can't get out of bed in the morning coming back to bite me in the butt.

PS In looking for a picture of Alec Baldwin, I came across some rockin' photos: here and here. He is a hairy man.

Dreaming

I took a nap this afternoon and woke myself up when I said out loud: "The only aphrodisiac you will ever need is math."

Theory of Conversation, Existence

Conversation is like bad blogging you can't escape. In conversation, you take turns bringing up topics that are only as relevant as your partner is sane. You can't skip the boring parts or open up a second tab. Most of it is repetitive and unoriginal.

And I have sinned. I often start a conversation with "I read online..., I saw on TV..., I heard on the radio...." By the time I have prefaced my tidbit with "I'm making up the numbers..., I wish I could remember the author..., I forget what he said exactly..." my contribution is basically: "I saw, read, or heard something unexpected and was surprised." Ta da!

To strain the electronic metaphor further, these conversations form the web of my social existence. A group of people that understands these references coalesces around me--business people for business stuff, religious people for religious stuff, and shiftless time-wasters for internet stuff.

Group fit, intelligence, and wit are then just a function of a conversation batting average. For example, I worked the wear-leveling of flash memory (hat-tip to feed) and "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." into a conversation with my boss and one sentence later seriously claimed there was an East Coast Television and Microwave Oven Programming Division at NBC. So I hit a double with the tech- and health-obsessed partners and probably a triple with the smooth 30 Rocks reference.

Regurgitation--that is existence. If you can vomit quickly and accurately you are intelligent. If you choose to staccato-puke out certain references, in the right order, with the right timing, then you are witty. Boring.

I want to do and be more. Instead of "I read, saw, or heard..." I want to say "I researched and analyzed..., I designed and created..., or I planned and executed...." To be more precise, I want to say those things and not be lying.

Not just lying as in being untrue to myself--like borrowing a metaphor from a sport I detest and then mixing that metaphor badly because I am intellectually lazy--though that is part of it. I mean actually lying. I mean claiming to have told my boss that a mildly humorous element of a soon-to-be-overexposed sitcom is true just so I could work in the McSweeny's 30 Rocks reference. Twice.

Don't Look

So originally I was going to write a very witty post about all of these people calling roll on their blogs. But then I noticed that there were really only two that I know of. You may know that too, if you tried to follow any of those supposed links.

But two points is enough to establish a trend! Or at least that is what I thought until I had to suffer through one of those "Bible is one point and BoM is another point" lessons last Sunday. The teacher phrased his clincher poorly and instead of asking "how many lines you can draw through two points" he asked "how many directions can you go with two points." A math guy absentmindedly answered "two." This, of course, is the correct answer but doesn't illustrate the lesson as well.

After a brief church chuckle, I mentally extended that reasoning further. What about D&C and PofGP? Aren't those points? How many lines can you draw through those points? What about modern prophets who can, essentially, establish any new point or direction God feels like. What do you do then? Collinear? Hardly. What do you do with the "as far as it is translated correctly" clause? Now we don't have a point, but a cloud of probability where a point could possibly exist.

I know, I am blowing your mind, and we are still in two dimensional space! Who said anything about these points and this cloud being coplanar? 4th dimension? Curved space? Special relativity? Black holes? Worm holes? Physics? Stopping a train with a cat?

Cats, my favorite gospel topic. Schlotsky's cat, specifically. Whoops, Wikipedia says it is called Shrodinger's cat. But it was actually two Sunday's ago--fast Sunday and all--so you can understand the mixup. As all pedantic a-holes know, Schnauss's cat is a thought experiment that says "if a scenario existed where a cat's state of life or death could be made dependent on the state of a subatomic particle, and also isolated from any possible observation, the state of the cat itself would be" in two states simultaneously. By observing the cat, you kill it or let it live. Observing the universe changes it.

You see, you could be a really excellent blogger. Or, like me, you could spend half the time posting recycled humor and the other half writing reflexive, self-absorbed nonsense to take a break from excel models. But as soon as you call roll, you find out one way or another--and suddenly your blog isn't such a gnar bucket. Gnar buckets, as I learned in priesthood, are the receptacles for the gnar after you shred it. "Nah bra, I filled up like six gnar buckets working my board on that rip."

Moral? Roll call = dead radioactive cats = empty gnar buckets.

The Secret of My Failure

Wanting to write the next great American novel is terribly cliché—so it should come as no surprise that I would like to. Well more of an essay than a novel and it doesn't have to be great, preferably just good enough. In the throes of writing my grad school applications, I feel inept, unexpressive, and just plain boring as I try to turn the humdrum disappointments of my life into stunning accomplishments. And if I can’t convince them that I am accomplished, then at least I can write about my mediocrity cogently and thoughtfully enough that they will be impressed. I have to—it is my last bastion of potential excellence. My recommendations will likely be laudatory, but not gushing. My grades are adequate, but not outstanding. My resume is serviceable, but not exceptional. My test scores are above average, but in the Lake Wobegone sense of the expression.

My essays have to take this proletarian record and in true propaganda fashion convince the politburos of America’s venerable institutions of higher learning that I am party material. With so much depending on these essays, I am finding them incredibly difficult to write. Acerbic wit and dripping sarcasm are great blog-fodder, but less impressive in a personal statement. Unfortunately, besides punchy business writing, the occasional rant about airlines or earthquakes on my blog is the only writing I have done since leaving college. And sadly, my go-to format when I can’t think of something to write, a link-fest, is also discouraged in these supposedly reflective essays. “I don’t know how an MBA would help my career at this time, but I just found an article on the 50 Most Loathesome People in America in 2007 that is my kind of mean-spirited vitriol. Oh yeah, and Buzzfeed has some mouths-for-eyes pictures that are creepy.”

So with excellence almost within my grasp and with mediocrity waiting to catch me, I will probably continue to fret about writing and continue to write about writing and in so doing avoid any actual writing until the last minute. But while this period of self-reflection runs amok, I will continue to parse stylistic elements or thematic devices from examples of writing that I hope to emulate.

These examples come from the most surprising places. Who would have thought that one of the more poignant essays I have read this year would hide itself in GQ? More importantly, who knew that I would ever admit to reading such trash aimed at the aspiring-but-not-yet-nouveau-riche? (Though I will freely admit to thumbing through Vogue—I happen to like non-silicone enhanced women in fashionable clothes—having another GQ columnist rehash the brown shoes with blue suit question bores me. As an aside, I should get 1000 points for implying that emaciated coke-snorting Vogue models better represent the female form than the silicone stuffing meth-addicted starlets on GQ’s pages. Also 1000 points for despising the nouveau riche despite my own negative financial net worth.) That gem, which I tore from the hundreds of other useless GQ pages on a NYC-LA flight, is below and my thoughts while reading it are in brackets. I think it is worth your attention--it had mine and instilled an unshakable sense of pending doom.


* * *

The Secret of My Failure

The secret of my failure was that I thought success was permanent. Like a lot of men, I had reached a sweet-scented peak [nice phrase] that I thought was mine for life. Then one foul day I fell into the pit of failure. And then come, oh, ten years when the postman became the most important person in my diminished life, because his footsteps outside our shabby little flat brought the possibility of some paltry cheque. [I apparently picked up the British edition of GQ—those turds, invading my airport news kiosks with their filth.]

Ten years of fretting about money. Ten years of waking up in the middle of the night, wondering where the next mortgage payment was coming from. Ten years to contemplate where it had all gone wrong. And ten years dreading that inevitable moment at a party when someone asked, “And what are you doing these days?”

The funny thing is, I was working like a dog, taking any job that came my way, because failures can’t be choosers. [That is a GREAT line. I really like this guy.] But it didn’t make any difference. All successful men work hard, but so do the vast majority of failures. [Crap, is that me?]

I had left my first job in journalism, as a staff writer on NME, with great expectations. I was 25 years old and for the previous three years I had been writing cover stories for the biggest music weekly in the world. I was quite popular—but it was only when I left NME that I discovered I was only popular with spotty, high-IQ misfits who were saving up for their first pair of bondage trousers. [Lol both at that sentence and the fact that he uses “trousers.”] Nobody else had heard of me. Nobody else wanted to know.

In rapid succession I was married, a father, divorced, and a single father. There had never been much money—Julie Burchill and I used to take bottles back to get the tube fare to work—but now there was none. For a single man, failure is hard to take. For a family man, especially a broken family man, it is poison.

Here is how failure finds you. First there is a creeping sense of dread and then suddenly the sky falls down.

“How did you go bankrupt?” asks a character in Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises.

“Two ways,” comes the reply. “Gradually and then suddenly.”

That is how your failure hits you. Gradually and then suddenly. Slowly, almost imperceptibly at first—the increasing struggles with money, the nagging sense of things not going how you had expected, how you like, and then the terrible realization that the world can get along very well without you—and finally disaster. The bills that can’t be paid. The career in the ditch. The relationship in ruins. Your health shot.

Jay McInerney uses that quote from Hemingway’s novel at the start of his own masterpiece, Bright Lights, Big City. Widely considered to be—with Bonfire of The Vanities—one of the ultimate zeitgeist Eighties books, Bright Lights, Big City is really the story of a young man failing: chemically, professionally, economically, personally, socially. All the ways we can fail. [Those books are going on the reading list.]

For all its references to Bolivian marching powder and clubs and girls with shaven heads, Bright Lights, Big City is really the best novel ever written about coping with failure, and taking the first steps to recovery.

The book ends with the protagonist trading his sunglasses for some freshly baked bread, down on his knees, stuffing it into his mouth and trying to keep it down. That’s what fighting failure feels like. It feels like it might just be beyond you. It turns your stomach.

I felt that way for ten years. From the middle of my twenties until the middle of my thirties, I was that man on his knees, struggling to keep the fresh bread in his stomach. My problem was that the only formal training I had ever received was how to take drugs with rock stars. [Hmm, much like the training of a consulting analyst!]

And there was no great shining moment when I felt failure was behind me. After ten years of slog, things started to turn the corner. There was money, there was opportunity, there was the ebbing away of anxiety. [Nice last phrase.] But when you have known failure—real, kick-in-the-bollocks failure [bollocks!? I hate this brit]—it never really leaves you, and you take nothing for granted again.

Things change. The new boss doesn’t like you as much as the old boss. There are tensions in the office. You are overlooked for a promotion / raise / blowjob at the office party [this is a family blog! but I included it because of artistic integrity]. You get sacked. Or you feel hemmed in, unfulfilled, and frustrated. You move on. And stumble. And fall. And fall.

Every heroic myth has failure built in to the narrative. We think of Ali with his jaw broken in the first fight against Joe Frazier, Sinatra in the dog days with no recording contract, Christ on the cross in his moment of doubt and pain. [Hmm, no recording contract vs suffering sins of all mankind….ok, yeah, sure, I get that parallel.] But we all know how the story ends—that Ali will me Frazier again in Manila, that Sinatra has Capitol Records and From Here to Eternity around the corner, and on the third day the stone will roll back, and eternal life awaits. [After all, eternal life would be more like eternal damnation without New York, New York—Sinatra’s most popular song according to Itunes. Yes I had to look it up. I actually hate Sinatra.]

Great men overcome failure and it makes them greater than ever. But when you can’t pay your gas bill you don’t feel like Muhammad Ali or Frank Sinatra or Jesus Christ. You feel more like Mr Bean. [Nice!]

They say that failure isn’t fatal. But it doesn’t feel that way when you are in the middle of it. Failure feels like it will kill you. Failure is the dirty bomb in the life of the modern male, as undeniable as serious illness, a condition it closely resembles.

Looking on the bright side, my ten long years of failure didn’t kill me. Somehow the bills got paid. I never went bankrupt. Although what happened to me was personally devastating, and not what I would have wanted, some people might even consider it a kind of measly, modest success. I never had a boss, or had to go to an office, or had to wear a suit and tie when I didn’t want to. I kept working at the job I love. One man’s abject failure is another man’s bad decade at the office. Failure is relative.

There are a thousand ways for a man to feel like a failure, but nothing cuts to the bone quite as acutely as professional failure, because so much of our self-esteem is derived from what we do for a living. So how to fight failure? Stay fit. Work hard. Then work harder. Then work better. No drinking to excess over the age of 30. No drugs at all over the age of 25. Never let your vices become your day job. Never get lazy. Never get fat. [btw, the Economist has a piece on beautiful people getting paid more.] And never ever bet against yourself.

There is no shame in failing. Great men have spent a lifetime on their knees. In his mid-twenties, Orson Welles was cinema’s favourite son. Then came decades of development hell. “Something always turns up when you are down and out,” said Wells. “Usually the noses of your friends.”

By the end, the man who made Citizen Kane was making sherry commercials. But a failure? I don’t think so.

“A man can be destroyed but not defeated,” said Hemingway, who changed American literature but ended up one sunny Sunday morning, aged 61, with a double-barreled 12-bore shotgun pressed against the roof of his mouth. They say his wife Mary was woken by two shots that were almost, but not quite, simultaneous. But a failure? As time goes by, Hemingway’s life seems more like a triumph, even though the colossus was torn down at the end by the nightmare-ticket failure of body and mind.

Hemingway believed any story followed to the very end would be a story of failure, and perhaps that is how we need to think of it. Failure—financial, professional, personal—is not a cruel act of God, but an inevitable fluctuation in life’s fortunes. You will get sacked. [close, sometimes] You will get sick. [not so much] You will run out of money [check] and luck [check]. You will get your heart pulped by your true love. [check, but hopefully she wasn’t my true love.] Failure in one shape or another will get you, because it gets all of us sooner or later.

Failure hardens you. This is a good thing. You get sacked and you find out who your friends are. You get your heart broken and you learn that you give it away too easily. You get sick and you realize that you took your flesh and blood for granted in your carefree, drug sozzled youth. [Brings back memories of my Dr. Pepper induced teenage haze.]

The big problem with failure is that it is so time-consuming. When you are worried about money your mind has no room for anything else. When the red bills are on your doormat you find it hard to lift your eyes to the stars. But failure is the best education money can’t buy. [lame line, for sure]. It will ultimately do you a lot more good than going to “uni” for three years. [At least, uni in Britain, which clearly sucks.]

Perhaps real and lasting success is impossible without the experience of real, grown-up failure. Until you have lost that job and lost that women and watched your self-esteem running down the drain you will never truly have lift-off.

In the school of hard knocks [yawn at that phrase], genuine grinding failure—the kind where people wonder what happened to you, and so do you—is like a double first from Oxford. Surviving failure makes you a man. It makes you run twice as fast as the competition, it makes you twice as hungry, it makes you twice as hard. Once you had your nose rubbed in dirt—when you have spent hours beyond counting waiting for the postman to bring some pathetic little check—then the competition has no chance. The safe little flight plans of your rival’s life—from school to university to office—are no match for what you have endured.

When it is happening to you, failure feels like a beating. It literally feels like you are on the sharp end of a kicking. And as anyone who has taken a good hiding will tell you, it is not the pain that hurts. It is the humiliation. Failure is like that. You taste it

But it leaves some steel in your spine. It leaves a chip of ice in your heart. [nice phrase] It makes you ready for anything. You always remember what failure felt like. And you remember it every day of your working life.

How dumb was I in my twenties? This dumb: when failure came looking for me, I was shocked. When I lost the job; when the money ran out; when serious illness found my family; when I was wearing my Harrington jacket to divorce court—I was stunned that any of this could possibly happen to me. “Nothing bad ever happened to me before,” I said to my mother, as though that meant I truly believed nothing bad could ever happen to me. That’s why it took me ten long years to climb back. I didn’t see failure coming. And I honestly thought it never would.

Don’t be like me. Bounce back fast. Expect failure to hit you hard somewhere along the line. But I promise you this—if you lose the job then you will find a better job. If you lose the girl then you will find a better girl. And if you lose your health then you might learn to stop putting rubbish into your system. [Unless you really are a failure, in which case none of this applies.]

Embrace failure. Make it your greatest ally. Because at the very moment they all think you are finished, your success is assured. [GREAT clencher!]




Alonergy Defined

Loyal reader Hayna has recently benefited from Alonergetic practices and dutifully sang praise to this phenomenon on her blog, with sundry friends and family chiming in via the comments section. In above posting, she decries the lack of a formal definition for the movement. Rightly so. While I did my best to help her understand the nuances of Alonergy by responding in the comments section (reproduced below), I was unsatisfied with the strictures of that form and with my hastily written reply. I consulted the only man I know whose Alonergy Star Efficiency Rating (similar to the Energy Star Rating used by the EPA and DOE) approaches 100%--in other words, the man who captures nearly all of his Alonergy potential. His name is Feed. My comments and his response below.

A note of caution: stop talking, blogging, or emailing about Alonergy or, in the words of one wise adherent, "Before you know it, we are all alone together and Alonergy as we know it disappears."

My original reponse:

My dear young practitioners/followers/believers:

I need to clarify several points.

1. Alonergy is not a theory, not an element of life, it is life.

2. I did not invent Alonergy as a theory, for it is universal and eternal. Nor was I the first to promulgate its principles, that was Feed

3. The opposite of Alonergy is not Togethergy, it is Synergy. Alonergy (1=3) was coined to express the opposite of Synergy (1+1=3).

4. You can't enjoy both Alonergy and Synergy any more than you can serve God and mammon or be both an extrovert and an introvert. If you think you enjoy both, then you are really a follower of Synergy who needs some time to recharge. If you are truly uncomfortable--always --when around other people, then Alonergy is, by definition, what keeps you going.

5. Quick Test: If you surf the web for pictures of Siberia or the Northwest Territories while at work so that you can fantasize about being in a place where you know there is not another living soul around for hundreds of miles, then you are a true believer. And if so, may I recommend www.trekearth.com.



Feed's response:

I do approve. Be mindful, though, that in communicating Alonergy to the community you do not become tempted by community, and give in to the sickly sweet seduction of synergy.

The basic, newly updated, definition of Alonergy, as I indicated on my blog, is: The non-interaction of agents or forces such that their effect is greater than if they had interacted. A heightened state of awareness, happiness, or effectiveness achieved by being or acting alone.

Alonergy is not a religion or a way of life. It is an observable phenomenon. Nonetheless, it is best discussed as a religion or a way of life.

The persistent (but never taxingly so) Alonergist will begin to see signs of encouragement and recognition from unlikely sources. For example, googling "Alonergy" brings up your blog, jenni's blog, and this kin of yours, but not myself as the real source. As an advanced Alonergist I am respected and left in peace by Technology, for we have much in common. I would hope that some day Technology will accord you similar respect.

A true Alonergist can be deeply, profoundly alone not only in a crowd, but with an intimate group of friends, or even a pet.

Never forget that Alonergy is a source of energy -- that invigorating breeze from a closing door as people vacate a room, the restorative sigh as one realizes one is at last truly free -- but the amounts of energy involved are normally very small. It is only the relative change for the better when one is alone that matters. Some of the greatest Alonergists are those with the least overall energy.

T-day

It is my opinion that Thanksgiving dinner is best enjoyed alone in Manila. Most of the Filipino analysts I know had a team dinner planned--which would be ruined if attended by a weird white guy that reports back to headquarters. Instead, given my lack of a dinner companion, I decided to live-blog my festivities. Unfortunately, I lacked the cajones to bring my laptop down, so I used Web 0.0 technology--my moleskin notebook--and my phone.

Frankly, Live-blogging makes a great dinner companion--probably the best I have had in the past few months (no offense to any of you whom with I have eaten recently, except Kent--I hope to offend you). The anecdotes were poignant, the banter witty, and the observations astute. Live-blogging correctly pointed out that pretty much all of the 20+ waitresses were exceptionally young and attractive, even if one had pointy Spock ears. Live-blogging also keenly noticed the slit on the side of one young woman's skirt went up right up to her hip. Always an eye-drifter, that Live-blogging....

But the food...oh the food. The Shangri-La caters to a number of different customers--Japanese, Chinese, Filipinos, Americans, Europeans, and they had a sign up for halal (Indonesian muslims or Arabs?)--so think a buffet many times over. They have all the main components of any successful buffet:

Things on a Stick: No joke, all 5 and 1/5 food groups are served on a stick--your basic four, plus desserts (which you stick in the flowing fountains of chocolate and strawberry-dip-that-looks-like-french-dressing) and baby octopus (which I think deserves its own baby food group).


Things that are Roasted: All of the cast of Animal Farm, minus the horse, turned out for this one. Now that I have wikipedia-ed* Animal Farm, most of the cast in fact stayed away. How would you even prepare Moses the raven? Ms. Lemon, I expect a recipe for candied raven's claw in the comments and on your totally awesome candy site for which you get paid to write and bake and eat. Anyway, Squealer was definitely laid out on the table. Maybe the turkey, goose, beef, and duck came from Charlotte's Web.


Things in Shells: Everything you would expect--if you expect that I would refine that statement with something that clearly negates it to try to be humorous like "if you expect sea monsters" (the actual text of my first draft), you are wrong. Cleverly they stacked the more traditional snails and spiders of the sea in ice sculptures that spelled RED--the theme of the night (the restaurant is called Heat, you get the picture).




Things That Are Desserts***: The mini cold-stone ice-cream bar and the fresh crepe and ice-cream dish were both tempting, as were the cakes, pies, and breads. My favorite, however, had to be the sub-category of Things That Are Desserts But Are Also in Cute Dishes and Backlit Dramatically.









After the main meal, Live-blogging and I played a traditional family Thanksgiving game called the Candy Game****--each square of a 20-square board has candy on it and you take turns getting goodies. I think dice are involved somehow, but it's not gambling because you always get something for nothing. But instead of playing it, we just talked about it. And instead of talking about the Candy Game, we talked about money.

Conversations about money while dining luxuriously in a third-world country are always sobering, although Live-blogging would prefer the term buzz-kill. The smart, dedicated Filipino analysts I work with (who have a great job by local standards) make less than 1/10th of what I do. Live-blogging mentioned something about market forces etc., me being 10 times as valuable, and was distracted by Slit-Skirt talking to Spock-Ears.

I don't know that I am 10 times as valuable. I think a lot about the relative wealth disparity among nations while I am here. Why hasn't reform come to Philippines? Why isn't there better infrastructure, education, and health care? Live-blogging, the bastard, asks why I am so concerned about this when on the way to work on Monday I couldn't be bothered to scoot over to the other side of the taxi, roll down the window, and give a blind old woman a few pesos? You know, why I can't I do my part? Multiply my apathy and selfishness by billions, he says, and there is your answer to how national resources get squandered. Like I said, a real jerk--mentioning that while knowing that I sat on the other side of the taxi each day since then hoping to see the woman again.

Anyway, a true Thanksgiving this year. The trip has highlighted a number of things that I enjoy quite by accident--health, employment, family, etc. I could make a Venn diagram to show how the intersection of all of these elements is so rare, but I don't know to represent the irony of saying you are thankful for family while adios-ing them to work through the holidays. Maybe just a dotted circle.


Notes:
*I just started a revolution by verbizing** Wikipedia
** Dido with verbizing
*** Parallelism is a feature of good writing. That's why I tortured that construction to fit with the rest of the categories. I mean, I wanted the categories to feel as tortured as the body of the post.
**** While Grandpa's definition of "candy" included candy, it also included knives, hammers, scimitars, battle axes, BB guns, and all manner of junk he could find at a discount hardware store. I understood the subtext of what he was trying to say though--violence, and the tools of violence, are sweet.

Our New Overlord: Standard Written (White) English

A fifteen-minute vacation from version 77 of the excel model I was working on (my motto: "yes, we can incorporate that…") took me to a British oil worker in Siberia exclaiming that the recent earthquake on Sakhalin Island likely caused several thousand dollars worth of improvements. From there, somehow, the interwebs directed me to a nameless finance drone who promised that his sub-prime heavy investment company, formerly headed by a Mr. Juggles, will "think twice" about where they invest client money in the future--which he notes is "a 100% increase in the amount of thinking we have done in the past." After some carefully masked lol-ing, I rounded the session out with this story on nerds from the New York times. Sayeth the liberal rag:

Though Bucholtz uses the term “hyperwhite” to describe nerd language in particular, she claims that the “symbolic resources of an extreme whiteness” can be used elsewhere. After all, “trends in music, dance, fashion, sports and language in a variety of youth subcultures are often traceable to an African-American source,” but “unlike the styles of cool European American students, in nerdiness, African-American culture and language [do] not play even a covert role.

Holla! Finally, a way for the college-educated single white male working for The Man to escape the influence of Africa-American cultural (not to mention athletic) hegemony. (As an aside, you will recall that I blogged about my hellish experience as an upper-middle class white male victim of a earthquake while traveling to Hawaii on a corporate expense account.) While continuing to mull the idea over, I wondered what other resources out there could help me understand how the seamy underbelly of US lexicography reveals ideological strife and controversy and intrigue and nastiness and fervor on a nearly hanging-chad scale?

I, for one, praise our new Google overlords because a search asking that question brings up Tense Present: Democracy, English, and the Wars over Usage by David Foster Wallace of Pomona College fame (w00t). What was the topic of this article that has had me thinking for days, while driving, while eating, while swimming? (btw, I have been swimming the long course at an Olympic pool nearby--the long course makes the distance sing by.) Why dictionaries of course!

What is a Snoot?

That’s right. A dictionary. But more precisely, a review of a dictionary. Wallace uses this review to launch into an expose of "warring" (think War on Participles not War on Terror) factions within the lexicographical community. Specifically, despite being one himself, Wallace wants to take snoots down a notch. What's a snoot? Explaineth Wallace:

Snoots are the sorts of people who feel that special blend of wincing despair and sneering superiority when they realize that the founders of the Super 8 motel chain must surely have been ignorant of the meaning of suppurate. There are lots of epithets for people like this — Grammar Nazis, Usage Nerds, Syntax Snobs, the Language Police. The term I was raised with is SNOOT. The word might be slightly self-mocking, but those other terms are outright dysphemisms. A SNOOT can be defined as somebody who knows what dysphemism means and doesn't mind letting you know it. I submit that we SNOOTs are just about the last remaining kind of truly elitist nerd.

Wallace meanders back and forth, taking his merry time setting up concepts and threads to weave together throughout the article. But, in the immortal words of both Curious George and George Bush: "F&#@ that s#@5," [Citation needed] I will just give you the LOL-lights--teasers that I thought were excellent and encourage you to read the article.

Pants vs Skirts as a Metaphor for Why Everyone Must Learn to Communicate in Standard Written (or White) English

Then let's talk about pants. Trousers, slacks. I suggest to you that having the "correct" subthoracic clothing for U.S. males be pants instead of skirts is arbitrary (lots of other cultures let men wear skirts), restrictive and unfair (U.S. females get to wear pants), based solely on archaic custom (I think it's got something to do with certain traditions about gender and leg position, the same reasons girls' bikes don't have a crossbar), and in certain ways not only incommodious but illogical (skirts are more comfortable than pants; pants ride up; pants are hot; pants can squish the genitals and reduce fertility; over time pants chafe and erode irregular sections of men's leg hair and give older men hideous half-denuded legs, etc. etc.). Let us grant — as a thought experiment if nothing else — that these are all reasonable and compelling objections to pants as an androsartorial norm. Let us in fact in our minds and hearts say yes — shout yes — to the skirt, the kilt, the toga, the sarong, the jupe. Let us dream of or even in our spare time work toward an America where nobody lays any arbitrary sumptuary prescriptions on anyone else and we can all go around as comfortable and aerated and unchafed and unsquished and motile as we want.


Why Snootlets get the Snot Beat Out of Them

Childhood is full of such situations. This is one reason why SNOOTlets tend to have a very hard social time of it in school. A SNOOTlet is a little kid who's wildly, precociously fluent in SWE (he is often, recall, the offspring of SNOOTs). Just about every class has a SNOOTlet, so I know you've seen them — these are the sorts of six- to twelve-year-olds who use whom correctly and whose response to striking out in T-ball is to cry out "How incalculably dreadful!" etc. The elementary-school SNOOTlet is one of the earliest identifiable species of academic Geekoid and is duly despised by his peers and praised by his teachers. These teachers usually don't see the incredible amounts of punishment the SNOOTlet is receiving from his classmates, or if they do see it they blame the classmates and shake their heads sadly at the vicious and arbitrary cruelty of which children are capable.

Why Political Correctness Blows

Forget Stalinization or Logic 101-level equivocations, though. There's a grosser irony about Politically Correct English. This is that PCE purports to be the dialect of progressive reform but is in fact — in its Orwellian substitution of the euphemisms of social equality for social equality itself — of vastly more help to conservatives and the U.S. status quo than traditional SNOOT prescriptions ever were. Were I, for instance, a political conservative who opposed taxation as a means of redistributing national wealth, I would be delighted to watch PCE progressives spend their time and energy arguing over whether a poor person should be described as "low-income" or "economically disadvantaged" or "pre-prosperous" rather than constructing effective public arguments for redistributive legislation or higher marginal tax rates on corporations. (Not to mention that strict codes of egalitarian euphemism serve to burke the sorts of painful, unpretty, and sometimes offensive discourse that in a pluralistic democracy leads to actual political change rather than symbolic political change. In other words, PCE functions as a form of censorship, and censorship always serves the status quo.)


How Many Dialects of English Do You Speak?

Maybe it's a combination of my SNOOTitude and the fact that I end up having to read a lot of it for my job, but I'm afraid I regard Academic English not as a dialectal variation but as a grotesque debasement of SWE, and loathe it even more than the stilted incoherences of Presidential English ("This is the best and only way to uncover, destroy, and prevent Iraq from reengineering weapons of mass destruction") or the mangled pieties of BusinessSpeak ("Our Mission: to proactively search and provide the optimum networking skills and resources to meet the needs of your growing business"); and in support of this utter contempt and intolerance I cite no less an authority than Mr. G. Orwell, who 50 years ago had AE pegged as a "mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence" in which "it is normal to come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning."

Airlines I Will Fly

Thirty minutes into a 15-hour plane ride and all I can continue to think about is "What is it about Asian airlines that makes them so great?" An outlet to plug in my computer on a plane, for one.

I admit my sample size is fairly small and I am excluding certain data points. Royal Nepal Airlines gets cut for thinking even though the weather radar failed, they could still make it fine back to Nepal from Bangladesh. That was not the case as I saw my dinner levitate in the air above me when we hit a thunderhead and the plane suddenly dropped a few hundred feet. Turning around to Dhaka, bad. Putting me up in a coach-roach laden hotel, very bad.

Air Pakistan gets the boot for confiscating my Discman batteries and my being picked up in a truck at the airport in Lahore (my host family had been car-jacked the previous day). Well, maybe that is not really Air Pakistan's fault, but at the very least they should have looked into branding their airline better.

Thai Airways, on the other hand, has always been a prize-winning plant. First, handing out dried, fried octopus instead of peanuts is pure genius. You don't even half to like it, you just have to appreciate that you are flying over the Himalayas eating octopus.

In misplaced patriotism (or just successful lobbying) the State Department will not fly a foreign carrier where a domestic one is present. So for much of my time traveling (not time-traveling), I was stuck with flying a domestic carrier as bloated and sour as their stewardesses. Cramped quarters, short-tempered stewardesses, bad food--your standard airline complaints.

Contrast that with my customer service experience at Cathay Pacific--the gate agents and counter agents practically fell all over themselves greeting me, checking me in, answering my every question. Sure they "lost my bag" and "they didn't know which city it was in" but they "felt really bad about it." It is all in the presentation--an agent approached me at the baggage kiosk, asked me who I was and confirmed that my bag did not arrive. He walked me over to his supervisor who had $500 HK ($70 US) waiting to give me so that I could buy toiletries and told me that I could file an additional complaint for the price of a new set of clothes so I could attend my meetings. (Which thanks to Zara I was able to do in an hour for $250 US--quite a feat in Hong Kong).

Finally, we come to my new love, Korean Air. I admit my class of service, in airline parlance, is a step higher than normal, but let me just detail why thirty-minutes into the flight I am forever converted.

First, free internets at the lounges (really pretty standard, but I feel like the internets should always come first). Second, the main steward greeted me when I sat down, knew my name, bowed very low, and thanked me for coming on the flight. We chatted for 20-30 seconds. (Eat that America.) Third, hot stewardesses. Cliché, I know. Chauvinistic, I know. But, men, am I wrong? Am I wrong?

Fourth, in-flight entertainment and it deserves its own paragraph. I haven't really explored it that much, but every seat (even the prolls in coach) have their own screen. Movies, corporate programming, music, updated tracking maps, and views from bottom and front-mounted cameras. Games like you would expect a South Korean would have. What, you want to play multi-player--NO PLOBLEM. What better way to cross the Pacific than to get in your base, killing your dudes? How ironic that just as my flight is tracing the path Soviet bombers would take over the pole, I can play a video game Ruskies created (and the west stole and marketed to great effect and profit).

Finally, the chair. These is probably more a function of a better class, but United is not pulling ish like this on their long-haul flights. Twelve-million degrees of adjustment, including into a fully reclining bed, built in massage capabilities, and a power plug. I could blow-dry my hair right now. I am not going to, but the point is, I feel more secure know that I could. Instead I will do work most of the flight. And blog. I love it. Now

When It Rains...

While at college, more than anything, I hated a certain type of intellectual pissing match that pervaded most dinner conversations at the dining hall. Those conversations went something like: "I am so busy lately…." The other people at the table would patiently wait their turn to unload the minutiae of paper deadlines, grad school applications, and other hallmarks of the over-achieving privileged liberal a-hole set while occasionally chiming in that they were shocked, *shocked*, that life is not actually a party.

This is to preface my post, saying, in effect, I know my subsequent ranting is wrong (I am shocked, *shocked*, that I am not the only that faces challenges), but I will do it anyway.

Up until the last two weeks, I had effectively "right-sized" my work-life balance. Doing its best to emulate the Empire (if the Empire were characterized by effulgent chaos, lack of planning, and a general willingness to sacrifice minions--1 out of 3), work struck back. The Empire had a few demands, couched in a passive-aggressive style so unlike Darth. Clearly I "have time" for some extra projects. Project Rumples is tedious and nebulous; Project Commy is the travel around the world type (literally, "we need you in China next week"); Project Mimi has been ongoing for months; and Project LOL is, ostensibly, my real job.

Project Commy excited me--until I realized that it accelerates every other project I am working on. "Because you will be out, we need this now." "Because you will be out, you need to move out of your apartment sooner." "Because you will be out traveling, you will clearly have some down-time" (don't understand this). Literally, with four different people circling me the way my size 32 belt will not (anymore), everyone feels like they are being blown off.

Moving sucks no matter when. Moving under a deadline while still working is like a witty simile that expresses how bad it was. I mailed my bike back to the mainland ($150, ouch). I still had two suitcases that were overweight ($80) and two extra surfboards ($160). My plan of slowly ferrying things back was as dead as dead Iraqis.

I needed all the time possible to get out, so I took a red-eye Friday night, getting into LA at 7:00 AM Saturday. Quick trip to Barbara's to drop off all of my loot, and back to the airport for Chin0rz for flight out at noon. Trip up to SF to catch the flight to Beijing to in turn start my hopping around the country.

Checking in when switching flights in San Francisco was the first time I realized my grave error of not having arranged a visa to the Peeps Repub of Chin0rz. No visa, no trip. Can't do it in country. Won't let you on the plane. And now I am in SF. Effing great.

After an initial sinking feel of imagining having to explain not showing up to one of my many bosses, Senator Ted Steven's words came into my heart. "To teh tubes" I said, mentally noting to make sure I misspelled the the.

Teh tubes did not disappoint. God bless the "one country, two systems" heart of the Commies.

* * *

As an aside, I think the Rage Against the Machine sums up the HK - Beijing relationship pretty well:

Beijing: And now you do what we told you, and now you do what we told you….
Hong Kong: F you I won't do what you tell me….
Beijing: Are you aware that we are willing to begin killing in the name of?
Hong Kong: this just in, we will do what you told us.

* * *

So Hong Kong still knows that while America is justified in subjecting anyone coming into this country to the most stringent scrutiny, maddening red tape, and arcane, downright, asinine visa process, Americans should not be subject to the same. Or even the inconvenience of having to get a rubber stamp.

So the plan is to waste approximately 9 hours at the airport waiting for a flight to Vancouver (not being able to leave, because they don't seem to be able to locate my bag), so I can catch a 3 AM flight to Hong Kong. Which, in the ironies of all my little ponies, is *exactly* how I hoped to spend my Saturday night.

Perry, my concierge at the Ritz-Carlton Hong Kong (pheww, I have been waiting to mention that) informed me that, in fact, he would be delighted to take care of my visa trouble. Hopefully it will work out.

It doesn't help that I buy one-way tickets to foreign countries at the last minute, then don't fly on them, and buy more tickets. I was hit with the quadruple SSSS on my boarding pass twice already. That stands for Special Screening Special Screening. Apparently, much like the goose in Charlotte's Web, TSA has to say everything twice. Also, apparently DHS thinks that real Americans always buy round trip tickets and always plan ahead. Terrorists, on the other hand, clearly do things like coordinate four simultaneous plane hijackings at the last minute and are very cost conscious ("We have to think about our mayhem-to-cost ratio here, guys. You *know* they are going to audit are expense reports.)

I am tired. Already it has been 36 hours of packing, planes, pickups, and panicking--four of the five P's of traveling. I think for the next 24 hours I will gladly enter and heartily embrace the fifth P--piss-off everyone.

Most Emasculating Experience This Week

I have a favorite exercise shirt--a white and gray tank top that I wear constantly. I left it at Bonny's the other day, but I purchased another temporary replacement. The point is, I have been wearing this tank top quite often and have developed somewhat of a tan line.

Saturday afternoon I went for my usual weekend bike ride -- a quick 10 miler. Everyone in Hawaii exercises, and does so with very few clothes. To fit in, I shed my shirt for this ride. Halfway through, a truck filled with local teenagers passed me on the road. I could piece together what one teenager girl said by reading her lips and interpreting her gesticulations. The phrase that made the whole back of the truck look and laugh seems to have been something like: "I thought that was a girl."

I cycled home in tears.

Apparently, the combination of what could be called ampleness around my middle with the tan line from the tank top (which, as I looked at in the mirror at home) does look remarkably like the tan line of a sports bra. I also noticed, that if I were a woman, I would have some smoking hot hips.

Last Few Weeks

I have been strangely silent the last few weeks. Short update:

1. Half-marathon in Moab. Carried 30 extra junks in my trunks.


















2. Is anyone missing a comb? Or a rake? Why did you stick it in my shoulder?











3. Loyal reader Kent requested surgery pics.













(Not pictured): Staying in bed for 48 hours straight with a bottle of Vicodin and a bottle of Ambien. Surprisingly, not the first weekend that has happened.

Themes

A well-formulated and powerfully executed thesis is a sine qua non of a successful blog. Despite my munificent history of penning courageous and acerbic blog posts, Loyal Reader Kent has levied a charge against me of "writing about nothing." I must respectfully disagree with the good gentleman from Garbage Grove. Though an articulation of my iconoclastic remarks heretofore blogged antedates the formal collection of my blogging themes, that shall in no regard diminish the efficacy of my ex post facto imposition of a series of themes on my blog. Said themes of my blog:

1. Me
2. Stuff I think about
3. Stuff I would like others to think I am thinking about
4. Whatever I want


Clearly, not only is this blog a dynamic and informative station on the series of tubes that is the world wide web, but it is also a community affair covering a broad range of topics. Can I help it if I am the Kevin Bacon of my own life--that everything in my life somehow connects back to me? I blog what I know and I know me. Can't help it. If you thought as much about myself as I do (both qualitatively and quantitatively), I am sure you would blog about me as well.

Capturing my stoic media consumption, spartan consumerism, and hostile clichedness is no mean task. Likewise, the depth, breadth, and genius (not to mention correctness) of my social views and political agenda is not easily articulated nor understood. I believe I single-handedly placed the phrase "You just blew my mind" in the modern lexicon. For you beginners out there (or for you who have incredibly boring blogs, you know who you are), let me share a few methods I use to develop the themes mentioned above.

1. Plagiarize. If you think something is funny (and if you are me), then others will as well. They will think even more of you, if they are convinced you originally conceived that humorous item.

2. Don't let not having anything to say stop you from posting.

3. Accuse anyone of anything. This works well in person as well. For example, I recently accused an acquaintance of being a narrow-minded psuedo-intellectual carbon copy of someone with real opinions. Her crime? Well, she cited Atlas Shrugged as the best book ever. (Full disclosure, I have never read Atlas Shrugged. Lesson: don't let a lack of knowledge stop you.)

4. Know your audience. Well, know how to belittle your audience. Have a handful of trite and transparent conventions that make you seems smarter, cooler, and more handsome than you really are. For example, I rarely study for the GRE, but I have the book open now to copy words that I never really use into this post.

5. Sprinkle pictures throughout your post. This is really a part of under-estimating your audience--knowing that few, if any, read what you write and are instead looking for pictures.

6. Make sure your post passes the laugh test. For example, I have already laughed to myself many times in writing this post. That's how I know it is quality.

I have already grown tired of this post. This was all meant to introduce and explain two key events in my life. I watched Ghost Rider over the weekend. No. Words. To. Describe. Worth the $7 to experience some of the most hackneyed writing and deleterious (had to turn the page to get that one) acting I have seen in the past 12 months. Motorcycles and clingy shirts--what more is there in a movie? 8 thumbs up.















Also, the OC has come to an end. Sadly. I stuck through the series, even in the bad times. I found myself (self-effacing admission of guilt coming) actually checking the message boards on Fox to see what others 16-year old girls felt about the ending.

Spoiler Alert: The ending involves Bounty paper towels.

(Continuing admission of guilt) I actually enjoyed the final episode--knowing that these people who I have shared so much of my life with, will turn out to be ok. Also, one of the final parting shots shows Ryan contemplating his life at the now-destroyed Cohen house. For a brief moment in the driveway, Marissa--silhouetted against a fading sunset, brushing her hair from her eyes-- flashes into his memory. A truly moving moment. I googled for a similar picture. I stopped when I found bounty. I don't think it needs an explanation.

Nip Tuck

My cute orthopedic surgeon, Elizabeth Ignacio (sigh), says she thinks I will have to go under the knife--steel plates, screws, and all. Apparently, my shoulder is an underachiever and refuses to heal properly.

I bought my shoulder another 3 weeks to see if it can pull this one out of its rear, suck it up, and be a marine.

If my shoulder turns out to be a nancy, maybe sometime in March I will get cut up. I am thinking about asking for a tummy tuck while she is in there.

In other news, I bought a new bike.